Which statement regarding strict liability torts is incorrect?

The correct answer highlights a misunderstanding about the scope of strict liability torts. Strict liability applies broadly to certain activities, particularly those that are inherently dangerous or involve a high risk of harm, rather than being restricted to services alone. This principle is grounded in the idea that some activities, due to their nature, can lead to harm regardless of the precautions taken.

For instance, strict liability is commonly applied in cases involving the use of explosives, keeping wild animals, or manufacturing defective products. These activities can pose significant risks to others, and individuals or companies engaging in them can be held liable for any resulting damages, even if they took all possible precautions.

In contrast, strict liability does not pertain only to services, which can include various forms of professional expertise and consumer interaction. Instead, it focuses primarily on specific activities that are deemed so dangerous that liability is assigned without fault. This understanding clarifies the limitation of strict liability to particular contexts and helps distinguish it from negligence claims, which require a demonstration of failure to exercise due care.