Which of the following statements about the doctrine of stare decisis is NOT true?

The doctrine of stare decisis is a fundamental principle in the legal system that emphasizes the importance of adhering to previously established precedents in judicial decision-making. This principle supports the idea that courts should follow the rulings of higher courts to ensure consistency and reliability in the law.

The statement that is identified as NOT true asserts that stare decisis requires that precedent must be constantly followed without exception. While stare decisis encourages courts to follow established precedent, it is not an absolute rule. Courts may deviate from precedent if there are compelling reasons to do so, such as changes in social norms, new legal interpretations, or the recognition that a previous decision was erroneous. The flexibility within the doctrine allows the law to evolve over time while still providing a framework of stability.

The other statements regarding the doctrine of stare decisis are accurate: it is indeed a policy of courts to stand by precedent, it contributes to the stability and predictability of the law, and it allows different states to establish their own precedents without being bound by the decisions of other jurisdictions. This highlights the balance between adhering to established rules and allowing for adaptability when necessary.