Which of the following does NOT constitute invasion of privacy?

The correct answer is based on the legal definition of invasion of privacy, which includes several distinct torts.

In the context of invasion of privacy, misappropriation of a person’s likeness, publication of false light information, and public disclosure of objectionable private facts all directly violate an individual’s right to privacy. These acts can lead to legal consequences if they unlawfully invade someone’s private life or misrepresent them without consent.

However, intrusion upon the seclusion of another without a reasonable expectation of privacy does not constitute a violation of privacy because it is ambiguous without a context suggesting that the intrusion actually occurred. Invasion of privacy typically requires that the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy at the time of the intrusion. If there is a lack of such expectation, it’s unlikely that the legal threshold for privacy invasion has been met.

Thus, understanding the legal frameworks around the expectations of privacy and the criteria for what constitutes an illegal invasion clarifies why the second option does not constitute an invasion of privacy.