Which of the following actions could lead to a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress?

Intentional infliction of emotional distress occurs when an individual engages in extreme and outrageous conduct that is intended to cause, or does result in, severe emotional distress to another person. Making outrageous and false statements is a classic example of this tort, as it meets the criteria of being egregious enough to shock a reasonable person and has the potential to significantly harm someone emotionally. Such conduct goes beyond mere teasing or joking and can result in a claim for damages due to the severe impact it may have on the victim's mental wellbeing.

In contrast, the other actions listed may not rise to the level of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Joking about someone’s personal life might be normal social banter that could potentially be hurtful, but it hardly qualifies as extreme or outrageous conduct. Non-malicious teasing is typically seen as lighthearted and unlikely to cause severe emotional distress. Failing to recognize someone’s feelings, while potentially insensitive, does not typically involve the deliberate intention to cause distress and is often more reflective of social misunderstanding than outrageous behavior.