Which ethical breach would NOT typically arise from a real estate agent usurping an investment opportunity?

In the context of a real estate agent usurping an investment opportunity, breaching confidentiality is not typically involved. This situation more commonly relates to how the agent handles opportunities that arise from their professional position, potentially prioritizing personal gain over their clients' interests.

When agents usurp opportunities, they often engage in untruthfulness by not disclosing relevant information to clients or manipulating facts to justify their actions. Additionally, a conflict of interest arises because the agent's personal interest in the investment conflicts with their obligation to act in the best interest of their clients. Failing to keep promises can also be a factor, as the agent may not fulfill their commitments to clients in order to pursue their own investment interests.

In contrast, a breach of confidentiality generally involves the misuse of private information obtained in the course of a professional relationship, such as disclosing clients' financial details without consent. Usurping investment opportunities does not necessarily implicate confidentiality but primarily issues related to loyalty and honesty.