When considering relocating its plant to Asia, which ethical reasoning is MOST LIKELY to support Sigma Company's decision?

Utilitarianism is the ethical reasoning that evaluates the rightness or wrongness of an action based on its overall consequences, particularly in terms of maximizing happiness or minimizing suffering for the greatest number of people. In the context of relocating its plant to Asia, Sigma Company would likely consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a move.

If the decision to relocate results in lower production costs, increased efficiency, and improved profitability for the company, these outcomes could contribute positively to the welfare of shareholders, employees, and potentially consumers. Furthermore, if the move facilitates job creation in the new location or leads to more affordable products for consumers, utilitarian reasoning would support the relocation as it would promote the greatest good for the greatest number.

The other ethical frameworks might not emphasize the same outcome-oriented approach. Cultural relativism focuses on understanding and evaluating practices within their own cultural contexts, which may not directly address the economic outcomes of the relocation. Kantian ethics emphasizes duties and moral rules rather than the consequences of actions, thus making it less suitable for a decision driven by a utilitarian perspective. Distributive justice, influenced by John Rawls, concentrates on fairness and equity in the distribution of resources, which may complicate the straightforward cost-benefit analysis characteristic of utilitarianism