What would be the likely outcome if Joe sent a check marked "Account Paid in Full" for a disputed debt?

In this scenario, Joe sending a check marked "Account Paid in Full" indicates an intention to settle the entire disputed debt with that payment. This phrase typically suggests that Joe views his payment as a complete resolution of the matter, and if the recipient, in this case, Green Lawn, cashes the check, it can imply acceptance of the payment as full settlement of the dispute.

According to the legal principle of accord and satisfaction, a debtor can settle their debt by making a payment that is accepted by the creditor. If a creditor negotiates a check that clearly states "Account Paid in Full," it can be interpreted as an acceptance of that payment as full satisfaction of the debt. Therefore, if Green Lawn cashes the check, they are likely acknowledging Joe's payment as resolving the entire obligation, even if there was a dispute over the remaining amount.

This situation emphasizes the importance of how payment terms are communicated and accepted. If Joe's intent was clear and the creditor accepted the payment, then it is reasonable to conclude that the payment would effectively resolve the dispute. Thus, Joe's payment would indeed be sufficient to settle the dispute, validating the interpretation that option C is correct.