What recourse does Clarisse have after discovering she purchased a deceptive bull?

The appropriate recourse for Clarisse after discovering she purchased a deceptive bull is to choose to seek money damages or rescind the contract. This is based on the legal principle that when a buyer has been misled or deceived about a significant aspect of the sold item, they typically have multiple remedies available.

Rescission, which allows the buyer to cancel the contract and receive a refund, is a common remedy in cases involving misrepresentation. In addition, seeking money damages is also an option, particularly if the buyer has incurred losses as a result of the deception, such as veterinary costs or the cost of replacing the bull. The law acknowledges that misrepresentation can harm the buyer financially, and thus, allowing for both rescission and damages provides a broader avenue for seeking justice.

Conversely, rescinding the contract solely for minor misrepresentation (which is implied in another option) is generally not sufficient, as there needs to be a significant misrepresentation that caused reliance by the buyer. The idea that she has no recourse due to the seller's failure to disclose defects misunderstands the protective purpose of consumer laws. Misrepresentation can indeed provide grounds for recourse even in cases of nondisclosure, especially if the issue impacts the value or safety of the