What does the tort of intentional interference with business relationship imply for the defendant?

The tort of intentional interference with a business relationship implicates that the defendant acted with an improper motive to damage another's business. This means that in order to establish this tort, it is essential to show that the defendant had a specific intent to interfere with a contractual relationship or ongoing business relationship and that their actions were driven by a desire to harm the plaintiff's business interests, rather than pursuing their own legitimate business goals.

In cases of intentional interference, it is crucial to demonstrate that the defendant's actions were not just harmful but were taken with a wrongful intent or improper motive. This establishes the component of "intentionality" in the tort, distinguishing it from merely negligent interference, which would not require proof of such intent. Therefore, option A aligns correctly with the legal definition and requirements for this tort.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the legal standards involved in this tort. Proving that another party was untrustworthy, not having an obligation to follow business regulations, or limiting the tort to cases of contract breaches does not capture the essence of intentional interference with business relationships as it neglects the crucial element of intent and improper motivation.