In arbitration, what is typically less extensive compared to litigation?

In arbitration, discovery is typically less extensive compared to litigation. Discovery is the pre-trial phase in litigation where parties gather and exchange information and evidence relevant to the case. This can include extensive depositions, interrogatories, and requests for documents, which can be a long and costly process.

In arbitration, however, the process is designed to be more streamlined and efficient. The arbitrator, who acts as a private judge, has the authority to limit the scope of discovery to expedite the proceedings. As a result, parties may have fewer opportunities to gather evidence compared to a court trial, where discovery can be considerably more comprehensive. This makes the arbitration process faster and often less formal, benefiting parties looking for quicker resolution of their disputes.